preference utilitarianism in a sentence

• "' Preference utilitarianism "'is a form of utilitarianism in contemporary philosophy.
• Smart's combination of the preference theory with consequentialism is sometimes called " preference utilitarianism ".
• There are similarities with preference utilitarianism, where utility is defined as individual preference rather than pleasure.
• The difference is that antifrustrationism is an axiology, whereas negative preference utilitarianism is an ethical theory.
• Preference utilitarianism therefore can be distinguished by its acknowledgement that every person's experience of satisfaction is unique.
• For example, negative preference utilitarianism says that the well-being in an outcome depends on frustrated and satisfied preferences.
• Moreover, the ethical philosophies of Utilitarianism ( especially preference utilitarianism ) and Pragmatism commonly are identified as greatly employing casuistic reasoning.
• According to Harsanyi, " preference utilitarianism is the only form of utilitarianism consistent with the important philosophical principle of preference autonomy.
• Hare is best known for his development of prescriptivism as a meta-ethical theory, the analysis of formal features of moral discourse justifying preference utilitarianism.
• In particular, negative preference utilitarianism states that we should act in such a way that the number of frustrated preference is minimized and is therefore directly based on antifrustrationism.
• It's difficult to see preference utilitarianism in a sentence .
• Unlike classical utilitarianism, in which right actions are defined as those that maximize pleasure and minimize pain, preference utilitarianism entails promoting actions that fulfill the interests ( preferences ) of those beings involved.
• Proponents of a form of average utilitarianism ( known as negative average preference utilitarianism ) such as Roger Chao, argue that such an ethical framework avoids the Repugnant Conclusion and leads to few, if any, counterintuitive results.
• But that negative preference utilitarianism would say that extinction would be better ( in theory ), assuming that premise, should not count substantially against the theory, because for any view on population ethics that assigns disvalue to something, one can imagine future scenarios such that extinction would be better according to the given view.
• In a similar vein, Peter Singer, for much of his career a major proponent of preference utilitarianism and himself influenced by the views of Hare, has been criticised for giving priority to the views of beings capable of holding preferences ( being able actively to contemplate the future and its interaction with the present ) over those solely concerned with their immediate situation, a group that includes many animals and young children.
• The former are those " manifested by his observed behaviour, including preferences possibly based on erroneous factual beliefs, or on careless logical analysis, or on strong emotions that at the moment greatly hinder rational choice " whereas the latter are " the preferences he would have if he had all the relevant factual information, always reasoned with the greatest possible care, and were in a state of mind most conducive to rational choice . " It is the latter that preference utilitarianism tries to satisfy.